Archive for the ‘Film Making’ Category

Rehearsals prior to getting your video camera out.

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010 by admin

Rehearsals

Rehearsals

“To forego development prior to filming is to forego depth.”

The development of characters and building the thematic purpose lets the director and actors reach the deeper underlying meaning of the script.  By meeting with the actors and developing their characters the director guides them into his vision.  In the rehearsal stage it is key that everything is still in the development state.  New ideas and input are essential, and most importantly, the chance for the actors to bring their unique outlook on the character you have cast them for.  The director must be intuitive, looking for behaviour in the actors that resembles the behaviour he has imagined in the character.

Read the rest of this entry »

Directing the actors

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010 by admin
Directing the Actors

Directing the Actors

Now that you’ve bought your new video camera and you are ready to venture into the vast world of movie making you will need to know how to direct the actors. Directing actors is a strange process as you expect so much from them and yet you do not know them as people, at least not in the beginning.  It is imperative to meet them one on one as soon as possible in order to feel comfortable around each other.  Start by telling each other the truth and beginning the process of explaining the subtext, and fitting the uniqueness of the actor into the character.  A lot of work is needed, even for very little dialogue, but the care of every detail is the essence of filmmaking.  By concentrating on getting the mind of the actor focused, and getting the best of every line is the start of potentially good work.

Read the rest of this entry »

Film Student Bonus Topic: Italian Neorealism

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010 by admin
Roberto Rossellini 1906

Roberto Rossellini 1906

If manipulated in a subtle way, Neorealism transcends the barrier of reality and fantasy.   It makes stories out of real life.  The world becomes a stage set and the people its actors.  It is such a simple and complex idea – detaching yourself and looking at the world from another angle, the visualisation of seeing beauty in the normal world.  Joseph Sudek, the Czechoslovakian photographed through his studio window into the garden for decades.  Through the mist, rain, and snow, came abstract black and white photos of a pure intensity.  He accomplished the feat of seeing the extraordinary in ordinary.  The Neorealists were very similar in this way of seeing.  They reacted to what was happening around them, and dealt with it in an artistic way. They expressed, through an almost documentary style, stories of dignity.  In their realm each expressed them individually but were united in a common purpose.  “To view Italy without preconceptions and develop a more honest, ethical, but no less poetic cinematic language.” 1 It is without a doubt Visconti, Rossalini, and De Sica were key individuals in its recognition as a movement.  The moment in Italian cinema of Neorealism is considered an artistic evolution in artistic filmmaking.  “The Neorealists wanted to view their world afresh and form a new perspective, there by creating a ‘new reality’ through an artistic means.” 1

Read the rest of this entry »

Ideological Analysis of film-making

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010 by admin
Hollywood - Capitol of Global Ideology

Hollywood - Capitol of Global Ideology

“The economics of film determines its infrastructure and therefore it’s potential.  The politics of film determines its structure:  that is, the way it relates to the world.” (Monaco)

Film is our society’s modern equivalent of story telling:  A film’s value system will reflect in the style of the movie.  When a director makes a movie it becomes a reflection of his or her political beliefs and ideology.  “Whichever way we look at it, film is a distinctly political phenomenon.” (Monaco)

While the potential of film can change society’s dominant ideology and be revolutionary; the reality is that it is a controlled political landscape of media ownership.  Who ever controls the systems of distribution and production in essence, controls the political message and the belief systems of society.  Mainstream cinemas are movies that amplify certain aspects of culture and attenuate others.

Movies are a part of Louis Althusser ideological state apparatuses, a part of the institutions that the state (linked to media ownership) uses to literally sell its ideology.  This is done through the control of screening, distribution and its links to broadcasting systems.  An example is Ted Turner’s Time/Warner which is a huge conglomerate of mass publishing, broadcasting, production and distribution of movies.  Turner, a democrat in theory, has an American political agenda that reflects the dominant ideology of American Democratic Party to a global market.  The problem lies in that this dominant culture in film is western, written, white, male, and heterosexual negating the stories (films), of minorities, woman, different cultures, gender cultures and the marginalized.  Opposition cinema today is working, but without the clout of money and politics to back it up, the films are often not distributed.

Read the rest of this entry »

Film Appreciation – Assumptions and contributions of semiotics

Thursday, December 31st, 2009 by admin

The Thin Red Line

The Thin Red Line

After the debate of expressionism and realism the next major movement in film theory was semiotics.  Ever since the beginning of film history theorists have been fond of comparing film with verbal language.  It was only until the 50s and 60s that the real study as film as a language could proceed.  Semiotics is the study of systems of signs.  The French theorist, Christian Metz (Film language: a semiotics of the cinema 1974) used semiotics as a systematic and scientific method to analyse the ways in which film produces meaning.  This was in line with the structure list movement in linguistics and literature studies during the sixties and seventies.  All the theorists argued that film communicates according to a specific set of grammatical rules.

Read the rest of this entry »

mycamera explores the world of film director Lars von Trier

Monday, December 28th, 2009 by admin
Punk Auteur Lars von TrierPunk Auteur Lars von Trier

In the era after the Second World war, Scandinavia was admired for having the world’s most tolerant and provident societies. But Lars von Trier’s mother, who worked for the Danish social ministry in the 1950s and 1960s trying to find locations for institutions for people with learning difficulties, still encountered prejudice in affluent areas of Copenhagen where her family lived. Lars was born in 1956 and brought up in what he recalled as a culturally radical home where only strong emotions and religious faith were forbidden. He was a disturbed boy, who had ‘a phobia about everything but spiders, and he could easily develop that’; he particularly had an obsession with control, saying that he felt he had constantly to rearrange objects in his surroundings to avert disaster. At the age of 12 he ran away from school and then briefly attended a remedial day centre. He later referred to this as a ‘mental hospital’. Since he wanted to be mad, he felt ‘very much related to the outcast’.

Von Trier’s compulsions about arranging the world around him were a strong motivation for moviemaking, at first with a Super 8 camera given by his mother (he practised tracking shots on his bike) and later on 16mm at the Danish Film School. His education there gave him limitless opportunities for what he described as his ‘fetishistic attraction to film technology – it was just fantastic to be able to touch all these appliances’. This interest in technology set his early style in three student films (all won awards), his TV commercial output (he made dozens) and his first trilogy of features. He was capable of imitating the lighting, cutting and camera techniques of any of his favourite directors. His first widely-seen film, Europa (1991), was, remarked the critic Derek Malcolm, ‘Orson Welles crossed with Ingmar Bergman with a dash of Fellini stirred in … so dark a noir that even its shadows had shadows’. Von Trier acknowledged its debts to Hitchcock’s work of the 1940s but still liked issuing wild manifestos with his films, denouncing commercial cinema.

Read the rest of this entry »